What is the impact of a medical marijuana recommendation in a motor vehicle accident case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cohen, B284216 (Cal. App. 2018):

appellant's 2015 recommendation for medical marijuana and his potential drug use prior to the accident in 2014 was tenuous. However, assuming admission of this evidence was erroneous, it did not result in a manifest miscarriage of justice. (See People v. Watson, supra, 46 Cal.2d at p. 836.)

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to suppress evidence in a medical malpractice case, has a recommending physician ever been allowed to attach a statement recommending marijuana for medical purposes? (California, United States of America)
What is the defense of accident or misfortune in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a medical marijuana recommendation vitiated probable cause to search a vehicle? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law on the sufficiency of evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.