California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center Associates, 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 301, 235 Cal.App.3d 1220 (Cal. App. 1991):
In proving fraud, however, rarely does a plaintiff have direct evidence of a defendant's fraudulent intent. Therefore, the subsequent conduct of a defendant, such as his failure to immediately carry out his pledge has some evidentiary value to show that a defendant made the promise without the intent to keep the obligation. But, " 'something more than nonperformance is required to prove the defendant's intent not to perform his promise.' [Citations.]" (Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 18, 30, 216 Cal.Rptr. 130, 702 P.2d 212.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.