What is the evidence supporting the inference that defendant committed a series of fraudulent claims under the Medi-Cal program?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hathaway, 103 Cal.Rptr. 638, 27 Cal.App.3d 586 (Cal. App. 1972):

The transcript specifies with considerable particularity the acts which are alleged to have constituted each offense charged in the amended indictment. The evidence indicates that defendant filed claims for payment under the Medi-Cal program for services which he did not render, for drugs which he did not dispense at all, and for drugs more expensive than the ones he actually dispensed. The evidence clearly supports the inference that defendant committed these acts with knowledge that the claims were false, and with a specific intent to defraud the state. Furthermore, it is specified in the testimony which acts relate to each transaction listed in the indictment. (See People v. Jordan, 19 Cal.App.3d 362, 370--371, 97 Cal.Rptr. 570.) 11

Other Questions


What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the evidence that supports a claim that the evidence supports the claim? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Is there sufficient evidence to support appellant's claim that insufficient evidence supports his claim that he was convicted of failing to follow an instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any evidence supporting his claim that a prosecutor committed error by arguing that the default finding was second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial on a charge of sexual assault brought by defendant Perez, who has pleaded not guilty to the charge, is the evidence insufficient to support his claim of insufficiency of evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.