The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Ramos-Rascon, 8 F.3d 704 (9th Cir. 1993):
The officer also testified that, when he was not driving one block away, he drove on the same street as the appellants' truck, tailing it at a distance, and that he observed the appellants' behavior then. Because we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and assume that the jury resolved all issues in a way that supports the verdict, United States v. Garza, 980 F.2d at 552, we may not disturb the jury's implicit adoption of this portion of his testimony.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.