What is the "escape rule"?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Silva, F064330 (Cal. App. 2014):

22. "The 'escape rule' defines the duration of the underlying felony, in the context of certain ancillary consequences of the felony [citation], by deeming the felony to continue until the felon has reached a place of temporary safety. [Citation.]" (People v. Cavitt (2004) 33 Cal.4th 187, 208, italics added.) It arises in the context of felony murder when there is evidence that the fleeing felon may have reached a place of temporary safety prior to the commission of a killing. (See People v. Wilkins (2013) 56 Cal.4th 333, 348). It arises in "other contexts requiring proof that an act occurred in the commission of a crime such as inflicting great bodily injury in the course of commission of a crime [citation], kidnapping for purposes of robbery [citation], and use of a firearm in the commission of a robbery [citation]." (Id. at p. 341; see also People v. Portillo (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 834, 843.)

Other Questions


How has the escape rule been interpreted in the context of the "Escape Rule"? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
Does the escape rule apply to a murder committed to a perfect escape from lawful custody? (California, United States of America)
Does the escape rule apply to the continuous transaction doctrine? (California, United States of America)
Is forcible escape a felony inherently dangerous to human life for purposes of implementing the second-degree felony murder rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a statement by an appellate court of a rule of law necessary to the decision of the case on appeal conclusively establish that rule? (California, United States of America)
What is the law of the case rule on the doctrine of law-of-the case rule? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant manipulate the rule of rule 31(d) to bypass the statutory certificate requirement under section 1237.5 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the escape rule apply in the aider and abettor context? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of rule 2-200 of the California Medical Association Rule 2,200 for medical malpractice? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.