California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Summers v. Newman, 53 Cal.App.4th 1513, 62 Cal.Rptr.2d 400 (Cal. App. 1997):
The equitable argument logically flows from the rationale of the majority opinion in Quinn v. State of California (1975) 15 Cal.3d 162, 124 Cal.Rptr. 1, 539 P.2d 761. It holds, as to Labor Code section 3856 and by an explicit dictum as to section 3860, 1 that the doctrine of equitable allocation of fees and costs requires the employer to bear the costs, including attorney fees, of recovering the employer's outlays of workers' compensation from a judgment or settlement in a third party action where a single attorney represents the employee, the employer or, by agreement, both. 2 It makes no sense to me
Page 407
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.