What is the equitable allocation of fees and costs under section 3860 of the California Labor Code?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Summers v. Newman, 53 Cal.App.4th 1513, 62 Cal.Rptr.2d 400 (Cal. App. 1997):

The equitable argument logically flows from the rationale of the majority opinion in Quinn v. State of California (1975) 15 Cal.3d 162, 124 Cal.Rptr. 1, 539 P.2d 761. It holds, as to Labor Code section 3856 and by an explicit dictum as to section 3860, 1 that the doctrine of equitable allocation of fees and costs requires the employer to bear the costs, including attorney fees, of recovering the employer's outlays of workers' compensation from a judgment or settlement in a third party action where a single attorney represents the employee, the employer or, by agreement, both. 2 It makes no sense to me

Page 407

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 204 of the California Labor Code, section 204(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, allow for personal injury damages to be sustained in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Does Vehicle Code section 23558 of the California Vehicle Code provide notice of enhancements to a motor vehicle under Vehicle Code Section 12022.7? (California, United States of America)
What is the facial constitutionality of the section 17556 (d) of California Government Code 17556, subdivision (d), section 726 of the California Tax Code, providing that a local authority has authority to levy fees on behalf of a third party? (California, United States of America)
Is a conviction under section 23550.5 of the California Vehicle Code (formerly Vehicle Code Section 23152) of the Vehicle Code applicable to a repeat offender with a prior DUI or vehicular manslaughter conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Penal Code allow for an act or omission that is punishable by different sections of the Penal Code to be punished by one or more sections? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.