What is the effect of tolling in a sexual abuse case?

In Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles (2016) 247 Cal.App.4th 953 (Doe I), we held that a lawsuit brought by two men in 2014 for molestation they suffered at the hands of a priest in the late 1970's and early 1980's was untimely, but remanded to give the men an opportunity to amend their complaint to invoke the tolling provisions of Insurance Code section 11583.¹ They amended their complaint, but the trial court held that their new allegations still did not qualify for tolling under section 11583. Because this ruling was correct, we affirm.