What is the effect of the "slight evidence" instruction on possession of recently stolen property?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cardenas, H034519 (Cal. App. 2011):
Second, the "slight evidence" instruction regarding possession of recently stolen property is "generally favorable to defendants; its purpose is to emphasize that possession of stolen property, alone, is insufficient to sustain a conviction for a theft-related crime. [Citations.]" (People v. Gamache (2010) 48 Cal.4th 347, 375.) "In the presence of at
Page 43
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any error in giving the jury instructions concerning false and misleading statements or possession of recently stolen property? (California, United States of America)
What evidence is sufficient to convict a defendant of possession of stolen property under the CALJIC No.15 instruction? (California, United States of America)
When is a defendant required to prove possession of stolen property to convict him of the crime of receiving stolen property? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court reverse its instruction that a defendant was in conscious possession of recently stolen property? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between cautionary instruction regarding a defendant's statements and the rule that possession of recently stolen property is insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
Is possession of recently stolen property sufficient to support a criminal charge? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted Calcim No. 376 of the Criminal Code for the purpose of instructing a jury not to infer guilt from a defendant's conscious possession of recently stolen goods? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of possessing stolen property even if the vehicles and parts were not stolen? (California, United States of America)
When a minor alleges that she was in possession of a stolen Raptor Raptor when the Raptor was stolen, does the minor have to prove that she knew it was stolen? (California, United States of America)
What is the slight corroboration requirement for possession of stolen property? (California, United States of America)
