The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Whitehorn, 829 F.2d 1225 (2nd Cir. 1987):
Id. at 400-01. Accordingly, he concluded that neither the magistrate's awareness of the bomb sweep findings nor the errors in the affidavit were of moment. Finding nothing to suggest that any of these errors were the product of an intent to deceive the magistrate, he also rejected Whitehorn's argument under Franks v. Delaware, supra.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.