California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, G049977 (Cal. App. 2015):
Because of the court's failure to give CALCRIM No. 3470, the jury was not fully and fairly instructed. Nor was the error cured by defense counsel's assertion in his closing statement that the elevated self-defense requirements for mutual combat were inapplicable because the law does not "require unreasonable things." Defense counsel did not advise the jury on the requirements for reasonable self-defense and, in any case,
Page 22
"arguments of counsel are no substitute for instructions from the court." (People v. Harris (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1269, 1320.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.