The following excerpt is from People v. Fentress, 103 Misc.2d 179, 425 N.Y.S.2d 485 (N.Y. Cty. Ct. 1980):
While he may have wanted the rabbi there first, that desire relates merely to chronology and does not affect its inevitable disclosure. By suggesting a sequence of events, Fentress did not revoke his plainly stated agreement that the fact of the homicide was to be divulged to the police. The case, in this regard, is similar to State v. Martin, S.D., 274 N.W.2d 893.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.