What is the effect of section 1111 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is accused of a crime committed by an accomplice who is likely to have self-serving motives?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Garton, 229 Cal.Rptr.3d 624, 4 Cal.5th 485, 412 P.3d 315 (Cal. 2018):

"Section 1111 serves to ensure that a defendant will not be convicted solely upon the testimony of an accomplice because an accomplice is likely to have self-serving motives." ( People v. Davis (2005) 36 Cal.4th 510, 547, 31 Cal.Rptr.3d 96, 115 P.3d 417.) Section

[412 P.3d 340]

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 1111 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is accused of a crime committed by an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
Does a new enhancement pursuant to section 667.5, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant where the prior sentence was for a crime committed after the crime was committed? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is accused of a sexual offence in a criminal action in which he is also accused of another sexual offence, is evidence of his disposition to commit such crimes considered to be inadmissible under California Evidence Code section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who commits the crime of grand theft auto in violation of section 487, subdivision (d) of section 666.5 of the California Criminal Code, be convicted of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a crime before the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of Section 654 of the California Criminal Code on a defendant who commits two crimes against each other? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 186.22.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant and an aider and abettor of the crime are accused of the same crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.