What is the effect of requiring all 4,000 same-sex couples to be named and served as parties in a class action?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225, 33 Cal.4th 1055, 95 P.3d 459 (Cal. 2004):

The majority counters that "the legal arguments of such couples with regard to the question of the validity of the existing same-sex marriages have been heard and fully considered." (Maj. opn., ante, 17 Cal. Rptr.3d at p. 270, 95 P.3d at p. 496.) But this is a claim a court may not in good conscience make unless it has given, to the persons whose rights it is purporting to adjudicate, notice and the opportunity to appear. This is the irreducible minimum of due process, even in cases involving numerous parties. (See Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co. (1950) 339 U.S. 306, 314-315, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865.) Amicus curiae briefs, which any member of the public may ask to file and which the court has no obligation to read, cannot seriously be thought to satisfy these requirements. The majority writes that "requiring each of the thousands of same-sex couples to be named and served as parties in the present action, would add nothing of substance to this proceeding." (Maj. opn., ante, 17 Cal. Rptr.3d at p. 269, 95 P.3d at p. 495.) Of course, the same argument can be made in many class actions with respect to the absent members of the class, but due process still gives each class member the right to notice and the opportunity to appear. (Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co., supra, 339 U.S. at pp. 314-315, 70 S.Ct. 652.) Here, notice has been given to none of the 4,000 affected couples; and even the 11 same-sex couples who affirmatively sought to intervene were denied the opportunity to appear. (Maj. opn., ante, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d at p. 270, 95 P.3d at p. 496.) What the majority has done, in effect, is to give petitioners the benefit of an action against a defendant class of same-sex couples free of the burden of procedural due process. If the majority truly desired to hear the views of the same-sex couples

[17 Cal.Rptr.3d 286]

whose rights it is adjudicating, it would not proceed in absentia.

[17 Cal.Rptr.3d 286]

Other Questions


Can a class action class action be barred if one third of the proposed class does not want to be a part of the class? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
If the full credit bid rule is extended to bar fraud actions against third parties, can appellant bring an action against the third party? (California, United States of America)
Is a party who transfers his interest in an action after the action has been commenced and before judgment the proper party to appeal? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who pleaded guilty to a charge of assault and possession of a dangerous substance while still serving time served serve time served under a plea bargain? (California, United States of America)
Can a member of a class represent other members of the class in a class action? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a plaintiff's failure to join the action of the other party to the action? (California, United States of America)
If there is any antagonism to a class action, can the named plaintiffs be denied class certification? (California, United States of America)
When an arbitration agreement requires the parties to share the costs of arbitration, does the court have jurisdiction to order that party to waive its right to arbitrate the other party's claim? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a party seeking class certification for a class action? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.