The following excerpt is from Jinro America v. Secure Investments, 266 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 2001):
6. Cf. United States v. Vue, 13 F.3d 1206, 1212 (8th Cir. 1994) ("We do not fault [counsel]" for trying to ameliorate on cross-examination the effect of a witness' direct testimony, even if as a result of the cross "the effect of the initial impropriety was magnified.").
6. Cf. United States v. Vue, 13 F.3d 1206, 1212 (8th Cir. 1994) ("We do not fault [counsel]" for trying to ameliorate on cross-examination the effect of a witness' direct testimony, even if as a result of the cross "the effect of the initial impropriety was magnified.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.