The following excerpt is from Torres v. Prunty, 223 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2000):
as well; and continually disrupted the trial until he was removed from the courtroom and locked up. Although "bizarre actions" are not necessarily sufficient evidence to compel a Pate hearing, they are a factor to be considered. See Hernandez v. Ylst, 930 F.2d 714, 718 (9th Cir. 1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.