What is the effect of an order modifying the murder verdicts with instructions to reconsider and rule on a new trial motion?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Watson, 150 Cal.App.3d 313, 198 Cal.Rptr. 26 (Cal. App. 1983):

The order modifying the murder verdicts is reversed with instructions for the trial court to reconsider and rule on defendant's new trial motion according to the views expressed in this opinion. (See People v. Robarge, supra, 41 Cal.2d at p. 635, 262 P.2d 14.)

SPARKS and DAWSON, * JJ., concur.

Other Questions


Can a motion to reconsider a motion denying a defendant's motion to modify a $100,000 restitution fine be reconsidered? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be appealed from the order denying defendant's motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who objected to an instruction and verdict form referencing a lying-in-wait theory of first degree murder continue to oppose the instruction and the verdict forms? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the "other crimes" instruction in a murder trial? (California, United States of America)
In a second degree murder case, in what circumstances would have been a manslaughter verdict if the jury had been given the same instructions on the subject of murder and manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court erred by instructing the jury on first degree murder because the information alleged only that the murder of Agent Cross was committed with malice aforethought? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.