California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Berg, A156886 (Cal. App. 2020):
testimony in the prosecution's case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case. [Citations.]" (Delaware v. Van Arsdall at p. 684.)
We address the prejudicial effect of the trial court's improper limitation on cross-examination in part I.C., post.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.