The following excerpt is from Sanchez v. U.S., 905 F.2d 1541 (9th Cir. 1990):
Sanchez did not manifest any confusion. Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot say that petitioner was prejudiced even if his attorney failed to advise him of the consequences of the special parole term. Absent any showing of prejudice, therefore, we need not remand and require the government to issue a response. See Baumann v. United States, 692 F.2d 565, 571 (9th Cir.1982).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.