What is the effect of a reduction in the amount of exhibits in a personal injury case?

For one thing, plaintiff did not object to the order. There is not even a hint of dissatisfaction with the reduction in documents. In fact, plaintiff was "happy" to do it, blaming defendants for the surfeit of exhibits and initially representing it needed only three documents to prove its case. Generally, failure to object in the trial court bars a party from arguing error on appeal. (Mundy v. Lenc (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 1401, 1406.)