California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Yanez v. Vasquez, 280 Cal.Rptr.3d 569, 65 Cal.App.5th Supp. 1 (Cal. Super. 2021):
The court determined plaintiff's "undisputed failure to secure and serve the necessary registration certificate constitute[d] a violation of LARSO and provide[d] [d]efendant with an affirmative defense to the unlawful detainer action." Citing Salazar v. Maradeaga (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th Supp. 1, 12 Cal.Rptr.2d 676, the court concluded plaintiff could not bring an action premised on a three-day notice to perform covenants or quit because the underlying lease that formed the basis of his action was void. Judgment in defendant's favor was entered that same day.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.