What is the effect of a finding that a trustee acted reasonably and in good faith in litigation with a beneficiary?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Miller's Estate, In re, 259 Cal.App.2d 536, 66 Cal.Rptr. 756 (Cal. App. 1968):

'The reasoning just expressed is not affected by the trial court's finding that the trustee acted reasonably and in good faith in its litigation with the beneficiary. It cannot be said that it is the exercise of a reasonable judgment to assert or defend a position for which no reasonable support can be found in the trust provisions and the governing law.'

In Moore v. Bowes, 8 Cal.2d 162, 166--167, 64 P.2d 423, 425, it is said:

Other Questions


Does a finding that the circumstances might also reasonably reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding in a personal injury case have to be reversed? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a trustee was found to have acted in bad faith or without reasonable cause? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a jury's instruction that a single act is in effect the act of all conspirators? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party can appeal against a finding that a party to the Cannabis Control Act is acting unlawfully? (California, United States of America)
If a police officer stops a car and finds contraband in the vehicle and finds it to be illegal, what is the effect of the initial stop? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for overturning a finding that a jury could reasonably justify the jury's findings? (California, United States of America)
Is the beneficiary of a life insurance policy entitled to the proceeds of the policy to the beneficiary when the beneficiary is innocent of any wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's collective finding of doubt constitute a collective finding that a juror has a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
How have the trustees of a trust been found to have breached their fiduciary duties toward the trust by failing to disclose to the trustee that the trustees have a conflict of interest in the trust? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.