What is the effect of a court's ruling that a defendant has been denied a right to a hearing?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Qahhaz, A130398 (Cal. App. 2012):
10. Since we find no error under state law, we also reject defendant's argument that the court's ruling had the additional legal effect of violating his due process rights. (People v. Partida (2005) 37 Cal.4th 428, 431.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is appellant's claim that he was denied a right to exercise his right to a fair trial by a judge in the Superior Court of Appeal that he had been denied a fair hearing? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have found that Defendant Joiner did not waive his assumed constitutional right to be personally present at the remand hearing and that the court erred in conducting that hearing in his absence? (California, United States of America)
Does the "right ruling, wrong reasoning" rule apply to an evidentiary ruling that required the trial court to make findings of fact? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted "careful scrutiny" in a preliminary hearing where a defendant is denied the right to cross-examine witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to deny a defendant a post-trial procedural right to a hearing and a full and fair opportunity to develop his new trial motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the Defendant's claim that he was denied a hearing before an impartial judge because the trial court was predisposed to deny the recommendation for outpatient status? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court deny a defendant's claim that he was not informed of his right to counsel at the preliminary hearing? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be denied a motion by the Court of Appeal against the Defendant for failing to make a timely assertion of a right? (California, United States of America)
