California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rosales v. Stewart, 113 Cal.App.3d 130, 169 Cal.Rptr. 660 (Cal. App. 1980):
In Rowland v. Christian, supra, the court, in its determination of whether a possessor of land owes a duty to injured victims, stated that the following considerations must be balanced: the foreseeability to harm to the plaintiff; the closeness of the connection between defendant's conduct and the injury suffered; the moral blame attached to the defendant's conduct; the
Page 663
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.