What is the duty of a court to instruct a jury on any uncharged lesser offense that is necessarily included in a charged offence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lopez, 261 Cal.Rptr.3d 759, 462 P.3d 499, 9 Cal.5th 254 (Cal. 2020):

A trial court has a sua sponte duty to instruct the jury on any uncharged lesser offense that is necessarily included in a charged offense if there is substantial evidence from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant committed the lesser included offense but not the charged offense. ( People v. Smith (2013) 57 Cal.4th 232, 244, 159 Cal.Rptr.3d 57, 303 P.3d 368.) "To determine if an offense is lesser and necessarily included in another offense for this purpose, we apply either the elements test or the accusatory pleading test. Under the elements test, if the statutory elements of

[9 Cal.5th 270]

Other Questions


What is the test for applying the independent or de novo standard of review to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is charged with conspiracy to commit a lesser included crime, what is the duty of the court to instruct the jury on all necessarily included offenses? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that is assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant is convicted of a lesser charge of a greater charge of sexual assault, is the lesser charge necessarily included in the greater charge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied to a failure by a trial court to instruct on an uncharged offense that was assertedly lesser than, and included in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a lesser charged offence is necessarily included in a greater charged offense? (California, United States of America)
When there is substantial evidence that a element of the charged offense is missing but that the accused is guilty of a lesser included offence, what is the test for instructing the jury to convict the accused of the same offence? (California, United States of America)
Does a court have a duty to instruct on a lesser included offence when the evidence raises a question as to whether all of the elements of the charged offense are present? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for instructing a criminal jury on any lesser offense "necessarily included" in the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.