What is the difference between clerical error and an error of substance?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from El Tejon Cattle Co. v. San Diego County, 252 Cal.App.2d 449, 60 Cal.Rptr. 586 (Cal. App. 1967):
No. The distinction between clerical error and errors of substance, of judgment or of law is discussed in Kuhlemeier v. County of Los Angeles, 2 Cal.2d 257, 262, 40 P.2d 828. We are satisfied that any error that may have occurred here was an error of judgment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between a clerical error and a judicial error? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between clerical error in recording a verdict and deliberative error in reaching a verdict? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a clerical error and a judicial error? (California, United States of America)
Is there any federal constitutional error or error in instructing a jury to convict a defendant of possession of a controlled substance for sale? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant receive a separate sentence for unlawful acts committed at different times for different amounts of money against different victims? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a judicial review of errors by the California Environmental Protection Agency and a similar type of error? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
In re-examining the findings of the Court of Appeal's error review, what are the consequences of the error where the error is cumulative? (California, United States of America)
Is it sufficient for the jury to consider the error in finding that the jury considered evidence from which it could have come to a verdict without reliance on reliance on the error? (California, United States of America)
