The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sehnal, 930 F.2d 1420 (9th Cir. 1991):
Multiplicity. The defense complains of "multiplicity" in charging Sehnal in counts 1 and 2 with falsification of his personal return and in counts 3 and 4 with falsification of the corporate returns. The argument is without merit. Offenses are separate if each requires proof of a fact that the other does not. Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1931). The government had the burden to show the income that was
Page 1427
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.