What is the difference between a pleading under section 422 of the California Penal Code and the pleading under the Terrorism Act?

Respondent argues that it is not because the Penal Code section 71 violation requires an intent to influence the performance of an officer's official duties, and no such intent was alleged as to the terrorist threat. This argument begs the question. The issue is not whether the pleading used the same language to describe the two crimes. It is whether the accusatory pleading described the offenses in such a way that if committed as specified, the criminal conduct prohibited by section 422 encompassed the criminal conduct prohibited by section 71. (People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 290.)