What is the difference between a motion to reconsider an order granted or denied?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Imperial Ins. Co., In re, 157 Cal.App.3d 290, 203 Cal.Rptr. 664 (Cal. App. 1984):

Section 1008 of the Code of Civil Procedure 2 applies to motions to reconsider an order granting or denying a motion ( 1008, subd. (a)) and to subsequent motions for an order previously denied ( 1008, subd. (b).) In Graham v. Hansen (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 965, 180 Cal.Rptr. 604, the court explained the difference between these two subsections.

Other Questions


Can a motion to reconsider a motion denying a defendant's motion to modify a $100,000 restitution fine be reconsidered? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court grant a motion to reconsider an order granting a defendant's motion to strike a cause of action? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to deny a motion for judicial review be granted after a writ of appeal has been denied? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion, how do we review an order granting or denying a motion to strike under section 425.16 de novo? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion denying an order denying a section 1016.5 motion for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion denying a motion for reconsideration a separate order from the underlying order? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be appealed from the order denying defendant's motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Is an order granting or denying an anti-SLAPP motion appealable? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.