The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Fresonke, 549 F.2d 1253 (9th Cir. 1977):
In Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1970) (en banc), we held that, for purposes of the insanity defense, "wrongfulness" means moral wrongfulness rather than criminal wrongfulness. In United States v. McGraw, supra, we interpreted the Wade rule to mean that "a defendant lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct if he knows his
Page 1256
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.