The following excerpt is from Jones v. Shinn, 943 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir. 2019):
Jones initiated federal habeas proceedings on November 5, 2001, and he filed an amended petition on December 23, 2002. Id. Claim 1D of his habeas petition alleged in part that counsel was ineffective for failing to conduct sufficient trial investigation; adequately investigate the police work, medical evidence, and timeline of death versus injury; and conduct sufficient mitigation investigation for sentencing. Jones v. Schriro , No. CV01-592-TUC-FRZ, 2008 WL 4446619, at *5 (D. Ariz. Sept. 29, 2008).
Under the doctrine of procedural default,
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.