What is the current state of the law on warrantless seizures of cars by police?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Griffin, 251 Cal.Rptr. 643, 46 Cal.3d 1011, 761 P.2d 103 (Cal. 1988):

In People v. Teale (1969) 70 Cal.2d 497, 75 Cal.Rptr. 172, 450 P.2d 564, we upheld the warrantless seizure of an automobile in which police had cause to think that the victim was shot. The officers had seized the car incident to a lawful arrest and 10 days later a criminalist examined the car and found the victim's blood spattered on the interior. We found no violation of the Fourth Amendment and, in fact, no search, since the automobile was itself evidence subject to seizure. (Id. at pp. 508-511, 75 Cal.Rptr. 172, 450 P.2d 564.) We quoted our earlier language with approval: " '[W]hen the police lawfully seize a car which is itself evidence of a crime rather than merely a container of incriminating articles, they may postpone searching it until arrival at a time and place in which the examination can be performed in accordance with sound scientific procedures.' [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 508, 75 Cal.Rptr. 172, 450 P.2d 564, italics in original.)

In North v. Superior Court (1972) 8 Cal.3d 301, 104 Cal.Rptr. 833, 502 P.2d 1305, we applied the Teale rationale to uphold another search. There, the defendant was arrested in his apartment on kidnapping and assault charges. The police impounded his automobile, having cause to believe that it had been used in the kidnapping. They examined its interior without a warrant, and found the victim's fingerprints. We explained that the defendant's car had been seized "contemporaneous with petitioner's arrest, as evidence of the alleged kidnapping; the car was believed to be the very instrumentality used to commit the kidnapping." [46 Cal.3d 1025] (Id. at p. 306, 104 Cal.Rptr. 833, 502 P.2d 1305, fn. omitted.) The car was simply a piece of evidence in plain view which the police were justified in seizing.

Other Questions


What is the current state of the law on surveillance by the police state? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state or federal or state law on warrantless vehicle searches for identification? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law with respect to the seizure of child pornography by police? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on seizure by police officers during a traffic stop? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the right to search and seizure by police officers under the Fourth Amendment? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law in relation to the search and seizure of a person by a police officer? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on police failure to preserve physical evidence in the context of police misconduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on qualified immunity for a police officer accused of malicious prosecution? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on civil liability for sexual assault by a police officer? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on coercive police tactics? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.