California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Avina, E070428 (Cal. App. 2020):
"'"[I]t is the better practice for the court to require the exercise of the privilege [against self-incrimination] out of the presence of the jury."' [Citation.]" (People v. Smith, supra, 40 Cal.4th at p. 517.) "'[P]ermitting the jury to learn that a witness has invoked the privilege . . . serves no legitimate purpose and may cause the jury to draw an
Page 35
improper inference of the witness's guilt or complicity in the charged offense.' [Citations.]" (Id. at pp. 516-517.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.