What is the current state of the law on the meaning of proof beyond a reasonable doubt?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Acquah, C081642 (Cal. App. 2017):

The presumption of innocence and the concomitant burden on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt represent the twin core values upon which our criminal justice system is built. Many well-meaning judges and prosecutors have tinkered with explanations of the meaning of proof beyond a reasonable doubt without success and appellate courts have admonished them to restrain their creativity and faithfully abide by the now well-accepted instruction. (See, e.g., People v. Centeno

Page 5

Other Questions


Is there a reasonable likelihood that a jury would have understood the language of CALCRIM No. 370 to mean that motive is exempt from the rule requiring proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard? (California, United States of America)
Does the requirement of proof of every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt apply to jury instructions in a state criminal trial? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury interpret the instructions of a jury as permitting a conviction on a standard less than beyond beyond beyond the reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions to the jury in a state criminal trial that merely omit a proper description of the requirement of proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Are instructions to the jury in a state criminal trial that omit the requirement of proof of every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt automatically reversible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.