What is the current state of the law on sex discrimination claims?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Blake v. City of Los Angeles, 595 F.2d 1367 (9th Cir. 1979):

The district court found that appellants' sex discrimination claims spanned three time periods of distinct legal significance. The first period antedated March 24, 1972, when Title VII became applicable to governmental agencies. The district court held that the dual classification system in effect during this period did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it was "substantially related to and serve(d) . . . the important governmental objective of providing an effective police force." (Blake v. City of Los Angeles (C.D.Cal.1977) 435 F.Supp. 55, 61.)

Other Questions


When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law in relation to Title VII discrimination claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When two state procedural bars are invoked in a single order disposing of multiple claims in a personal injury case, can the state be deemed to be inconsistent with the other state? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal and state gender discrimination claim pursuant to the third and fourth claims of the complaint fail to allege a hostile work environment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.