What is the current state of the law on psychological factors affecting eyewitness identification?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Roden, 2d Crim. No. B277830 (Cal. App. 2018):

"[T]he decision to admit or exclude expert testimony on psychological factors affecting eyewitness identification remains primarily a matter within the trial court's discretion . . . ." (People v. McDonald (1984) 37 Cal.3d 351, 377, overruled on

Page 5

Other Questions


Is an instruction that focuses the jury's attention on the psychological impact of eyewitness identification factors relevant to its determination of reasonable doubt regarding identification? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state or federal or state law on warrantless vehicle searches for identification? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "cruel and unusual punishments" under the Eighth Amendment of the United States? (California, United States of America)
What are the relevant factors for a jury to consider in their assessment of eyewitness identification? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on due process when it comes to the exclusion of evidence of a pretrial identification "infected by improper police influence"? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on improper identification procedures in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "unanimity" with respect to aggravating factors? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining his mental state? (California, United States of America)
Does our decision not to grant a state official immunity from liability in a medical malpractice case affect the immunity granted to a state employee? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on misconduct when a prosecutor makes a closing argument stating facts that are not in evidence? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.