California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Garcia v. Superior Court, 40 Cal.App.4th 552, 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 913 (Cal. App. 1995):
2 Until recently, it was the exclusive position of the courts. People v. Allen (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 1513, 46 Cal.Rptr.2d 569 reached the contrary result; our majority opinion ably addresses that case.
3 All statutory references are to the Penal Code, unless otherwise indicated.
4 To use our dissenting colleague's People v. Eckstrom approach (People v. Eckstrom (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 996, 118 Cal.Rptr. 391), a Category II attorney would not show the same concern about a 1-year or 5-year prior conviction enhancement as he or she would show toward a 25-year prior conviction enhancement.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.