The following excerpt is from U.S. v. O'Brien, 35 F.3d 573 (9th Cir. 1994):
This approach to assessing minimum tax loss is also consistent with other guideline provisions which specify that loss "need not be determined with precision," but may instead be based upon "reasonable estimates given available information." See e.g. Application Note 8 to Sec. 2F1.1 (fraud losses). Further, at least one other court rejected a similar attempt to restrict the scope of relevant conduct in tax loss cases by reference to other potential tax code liability limits. See e.g., United States v. Pierce, 17 F.3d 146, 150 (6th Cir.1994) (civil tax statute of limitations does not restrict scope of relevant conduct under guidelines for tax evasion).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.