California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sena v. Turner, 15 Cal.Rptr. 857, 195 Cal.App.2d 487 (Cal. App. 1961):
Defendants now complain that the court should have also given the proposed instructions defining 'immediate hazard.' This contention lacks merit, since the instruction as given was reasonably clear. Hickenbottom v. Jeppesen, 144 Cal.App.2d 115, 300 P.2d 689. It cannot be said that the defendants were prejudiced by the trial court's refusal to give the requested instructions.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.