What is the current state of the law on counsel's tactical considerations?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Medrano, F068714, F069260 (Cal. App. 2016):
counsel's strategy was viable. (Little, at p. 1380.) Counsel's tactical decisions are accorded substantial deference. (People v. Riel, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 1185.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law in the context of the Court of Appeal's "tactical considerations" in deciding whether or not to second guessing tactical decisions reached by counsel? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel argue that counsel's tactical decisions not to object to a reference to gun possession were tactical considerations? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on counsel's tactical considerations? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law in respect of counsel's tactical decisions? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on tactical considerations? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "tactical counsel" in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on "reasonable tactical decisions" in the context of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does Counsel's statements imply that Counsel never stated whether a witness's statement was made in connection with the matter on which counsel represented her? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a trial counsel's argument to the jury that a lack of tactical purpose or satisfactory explanation for defense counsel's omission was a tactical error? (California, United States of America)
