The following excerpt is from Flores v. City of Westminster, 873 F.3d 739 (9th Cir. 2017):
7 Cherosky v. Henderson, 330 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2003), cited by the Chiefs, addresses the "continuing violations doctrine" where the plaintiffs had not brought a pattern or practice claim, and does not stand for the proposition that evidence outside the statute of limitations cannot be admitted to support such a claim.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.