What is the current state of the law in the context of the cruel and unusual punishment clause in the Eighth Amendment?

"What is necessary to show sufficient harm for purposes of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause depends upon the claim at issue . . ." Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 8 (1992). "The objective component of an Eighth Amendment claim is . . . contextual and responsive to contemporary standards of decency.: Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The malicious and sadistic use of force to cause harm always violates contemporary

Page 5

standards of decency, regardless of whether or not significant injury is evident. Id., at 9; see also Oliver v. Keller, 289 F.3d 623, 628 (9^th Cir. 2002)(Eighth Amendment excessive force standard examines de minimis uses of force, not de minimis injuries)). However, "not every malevolent touch by a prison guard gives rise to a federal cause of action." Id. at 9. "The Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments necessarily excludes from constitutional recognition de minimis uses of physical force, provided that the use of force is not of a sort 'repugnant to the conscience of mankind." Id. at 9-10 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).