What is the corpus delicti rule in the context of a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Powers-Monachello, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13, 355, 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 899, 189 Cal.App.4th 400 (Cal. App. 2010):

The corpus delicti rule provides that " '[i]n every criminal trial, the prosecution must prove the corpus delicti, or the body of the crime itselfi.e., the fact of the injury, loss, or harm, and the existence of a criminal *406 agency as its cause. In California, it has traditionally been held, the prosecution cannot satisfy this burden by relying exclusively upon the extrajudicial statements, confessions, or admissions of the defendants. [Citations.]' [Citation.] This includes 'preoffense statements of later intent as well as ... postoffense admissions and confessions.' " ( People v. Miranda (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 98, 107, 73 Cal.Rptr.3d 759.)

Other Questions


For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence that is relevant in the context of a criminal case relevant to the case? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on double jeopardy in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a corpus delicti in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Is a parent, relative, or co-habitant of a defendant in a criminal case outside the scope of marital privilege in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where questions in a paternity/support case can be used in a criminal context? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a person's character or trait of his or her character in a civil case admissible in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the corpus delicti rule in the context of an assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1202.4, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, how have courts interpreted the meaning of the term "criminal conduct" in the context of a criminal conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.