California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Goodine, B286617 (Cal. App. 2019):
In sum, we conclude the court erred when it sentenced defendant to a felony term for count 7. (See People v. Palmer (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 440, 444 ["It violates fundamental notions of due process to deem a defendant convicted of an offense
Page 8
on which the jury was never instructed."].) Defendant does not, however, challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support a finding that he committed a misdemeanor violation of section 25400, subdivision (a)(2). Instead, he requests only that we modify the court's judgment by reducing his conviction for a felony violation of that section 25400, subdivision (a)(2), in count 7 to a misdemeanor and remand the matter for a new sentencing hearing. That is the appropriate remedy in this case. (See People v. Edwards (1985) 39 Cal.3d 107, 118.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.