What is the consequence of a failure to respond to a request to provide a supplemental letter brief?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bryant, B276121 (Cal. App. 2017):
People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 264.) On February 6, 2017, we advised appellant he had 30 days to file a supplemental letter brief raising any issue he wished this court to consider. No response was received.
This court has examined the entire record in accordance with People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pages 441 to 442, and is satisfied appellant's attorney has fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel, and no arguable issues exist. Accordingly, we affirm.
The judgment is affirmed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
