What is the conclusion of an extended review of the evidence and relied entirely on the trial record?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wong, A137584 (Cal. App. 2015):
conclusion of an extended review of the evidence and relied entirely on the trial record. (See, e.g., People v. Anderson (1990) 52 Cal.3d 453, 479 [arguments about a witness's veracity proper when restricted to evidence in the trial record].)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, does the court review the entire record in the light of the whole record? (California, United States of America)
Is writ review the exclusive review for a trial court's order directing or refusing disclosure of records under the Public Records Act? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a murder trial where the prosecution relied mainly on circumstantial evidence? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the trial court on a motion for a new trial where a jury was not adversely affected by an audio recording that was secretly recorded during jury deliberations? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a ruling on a motion to exclude evidence, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
