What is the claim-of-right defense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Selivanov, B252894, B255166, c/w B255166 (Cal. App. 2016):

The claim-of-right defense originated in the common law as a defense to larceny or robbery (Tufunga, supra, 21 Cal.4th at p. 945), which, like embezzlement, require the specific intent to permanently deprive another of property. "'It has long been the rule in this state and generally throughout the country that a bona fide belief, even though mistakenly held, that one has a right or claim to the property negates felonious intent. [Citations.] A belief that the property taken belongs to the taker [citation], or that he had a right to retake goods sold [citation] is sufficient to preclude felonious intent. Felonious intent exists only if the actor intends to take the property of another without believing in good faith that he has a right or claim to it. [Citation.]' [Citation.]" (People v. Barnett, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 1143.)

Other Questions


Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Is the statute of limitations defense a "favored or disfavored" defense? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel be required to rest his case without putting on a defense? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the authority to imply that defense counsel fabricated a defense? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.