California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Borunda, 11 Cal.3d 523, 113 Cal.Rptr. 825, 522 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1974):
The second theory advanced by defendant was that the informant, by testifying as to whom he had dealt with in the apartment, might give evidence in support of a contention that defendant's possession of the heroin was only momentary and transitory. (See People v. Mijares (1971), 6 Cal.3d 415, 99 Cal.Rptr. 139, 491 P.2d 1115.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.