What is the burden of raising an issue?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Williams, 20 Cal.4th 119, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 275, 973 P.2d 52 (Cal. 1999):

Before addressing these arguments, we emphasize the distinction between the burden of raising an issue and the burden of proof. By "burden of raising an issue," we refer to a party's obligation to bring an issue to the attention of the trial court and the opposing party, with the consequence that, if the party fails to do so, it waives the right to raise the issue on appeal. On the other hand, by "burden of proof," we refer to a party's "obligation ... to establish by evidence a requisite degree of belief concerning a fact." (Evid.Code, 115.) This "requisite degree of belief" varies depending on the context, but courts commonly describe it with one of three verbal formulations: proof "by a preponderance of the evidence," "by clear and convincing" evidence, and "beyond a reasonable doubt." (Evid.Code, 115; see also Addington v. Texas (1979) 441 U.S. 418, 423-425, 99 S.Ct. 1804, 60 L.Ed.2d 323.)

Other Questions


Can a party who fails to raise issues before the trial court raise new issues on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Can a client sue an appointed criminal appellate attorney for failing to raise all the issues he wished to have raised on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have a burden of raising the issue of age? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated the issue of appealability when the issue was not raised by the parties? (California, United States of America)
Is a party who fails to alert the trial court to an issue that has been left unresolved forfeits the right to raise the issue on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of a defendant in a criminal case to raise the issue of illegally obtained evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant fails to raise an issue in the opening brief, raising it for the first time in the reply brief, is a claim of ineffective assistance forfeited? (California, United States of America)
What duty does the trial court have to instruct the jury as to the principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the issue? (California, United States of America)
How have the Courts treated the issue of whether defense counsel has forfeited the issue by failing to raise it below? (California, United States of America)
In the absence of a decision by the California Supreme Court on the issue of consent for searches and seizures, what is the effect of the consent process in the context of this issue? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.