What is the burden of proving that a post-trial Pitchess motion was denied?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Webb, B267363 (Cal. App. 2016):
Appellant bears the burden of showing the trial court abused its discretion by denying his posttrial Pitchess motion. (People v. Nguyen, supra, 151 Cal.App.4th at p. 1478.) Here,
Page 10
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden of establishing that a party defending against a motion of no confidence has the burden to establish that the motion is a protected activity? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to dismiss a charge of assault be denied if the motion is denied? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion denying an order denying a section 1016.5 motion for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof for a motion to dismiss a motion where the motion is to be heard at a different venue? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that counsel deliberately failed to object to a motion of motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a motion for a continuance has been abused or denied? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to deny a motion for judicial review be granted after a writ of appeal has been denied? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that a motion for Pitchess was prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
