What is the burden of proving that a petitioner under Proposition 36 poses an unreasonable risk to public safety?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Nolkemper, B279069 (Cal. App. 2018):

It is the People's burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a petitioner seeking recall of her sentence under Proposition 36 poses an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety. Under section 1170.126, subdivision (f), a prisoner "shall be resentenced . . . unless the court, in its discretion, determines that resentencing the petitioner would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety." The dangerousness determination is a matter of discretion based on the factors enumerated in section 1170.126, subdivision (g).7 (People v. Frierson (Dec. 28, 2017, S236728) ___ Cal.5th ___, ___ .) Contrary to defendant's assertions,

Page 10

the likelihood of future violence by the petitioner is not one of the enumerated criteria.8

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a petitioner would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "unreasonable risk of danger to public safety" under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an abuse of discretion when determining whether an inmate poses an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1001.36 of the California Mental Health Act exclude a defendant who poses an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety from eligibility for mental health diversion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a person who poses an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an allegation of an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety under Proposition 47 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a public safety officer's investigation by his commanding officer or other member of the employing public safety department that could lead to punitive action? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that a defendant currently poses an unreasonable risk to public safety constitute an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What rights does a public safety officer have to appeal an adverse administrative decision under the California Public Safety Act? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.