California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nolkemper, B279069 (Cal. App. 2018):
It is the People's burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a petitioner seeking recall of her sentence under Proposition 36 poses an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety. Under section 1170.126, subdivision (f), a prisoner "shall be resentenced . . . unless the court, in its discretion, determines that resentencing the petitioner would pose an unreasonable risk of danger to public safety." The dangerousness determination is a matter of discretion based on the factors enumerated in section 1170.126, subdivision (g).7 (People v. Frierson (Dec. 28, 2017, S236728) ___ Cal.5th ___, ___ .) Contrary to defendant's assertions,
Page 10
the likelihood of future violence by the petitioner is not one of the enumerated criteria.8
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.